They say that only truth can
set you free, but they never tell you anything about the ‘truth’.
They tell you to be honest
and never lie, but they never really define it.
So, what is truth? More
importantly, how do we decide if a thing is true or not? Is ‘truth’ a set of
commonly accepted facts? Or is it merely a belief?
How do we decide the finality
of anything? And why do we depend on the absolution at all?
Is it because we love our
comfort zones? Or is it because the inertia is too great to contest?
History has witnessed many
great beliefs being challenged and getting replaced by new beliefs. Time has
given us sufficient evidence to show that nothing is absolute.
There was a time when Earth
was in the center of the universe and there is a time when we are peeping
through the windows of the universe to see if we have a neighbor.
Point being, truth can be
challenged in light of facts that state otherwise.
Yet another perspective that
can question the absolution of truth is relativity.
Every fact, every belief,
every bit of information is relative. What is right for one person can be
outrageous for another. What is interesting for one can be shady for another.
To quote an example, when its
broad daylight in the US, its midnight in Indonesia. Does it mean that either
one of the two are false? No. It simply means that both are right, both are
‘true’ with respect to another sun but not to each other.
Common knowledge or wide
acceptance elevates the status of any information from ‘fact’ to ‘truth’. But
does it mean that the majority is necessarily right? Not always.
The thing about ‘truth’ is
that it can be challenged and changed. So, to believe in its absolution and
stop looking beyond what is already known, is not just ludicrous but also
insipid.
So stop resisting and start
looking for it’s never too late to explore!
No comments:
Post a Comment